Showing posts with label expression evaluation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label expression evaluation. Show all posts

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Expression Evaluation



Infix to Postfix transformation and evaluation


Here, I would like to share a java source for converting an Infix expression to a Postfix equivalent and evaluate the Postfix expression. Postfix is also known as "Reverse Polish Notation". If you want to know more about this algorithm, this will be helpful.

Here is a simple java implementation. (Oh, we could do it a lot easily in C++, but, actually it has a academic purpose as well). A few things to note:
  • Fixed format of input, as this is just a demonstration. Do not use spaces.
  • It doesn't check whether the given expression is consistent or not.
  • No math error is checked here, you have to add it to your own.
  • Check sample execution for more details.
  • Only for binary operators +,-,*,/,%,^ and parenthesis ()


Java Source



//
// @author Zobayer
// @date May 10, 2010
//

import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Stack;

//
// Demonstrates Expression evaluation process.
// Doesn't take care of wrong input,
// You need to handle that on your own.
//

public class Expression {

// A sample main() method to demonstrate this process
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
BufferedReader stdin = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
String expr;
List<String> inFix, postFix;
int result;

while((expr = stdin.readLine())!=null) {
expr = "(" + expr + ")";
inFix = getInFix(expr);
postFix = getPostFix(inFix);
result = evaluate(postFix);
System.out.println("Postfix form: " + postFix);
System.out.println("Result: " + result);
}
}

// Parse the input string and form an infix notation
static List<String> getInFix(String expr) {
List<String> list = new ArrayList<String>();
int n, i;
char ch;
boolean hasInt;

for(i = n = 0, hasInt = false; i < expr.length(); i++) {
ch = expr.charAt(i);
if(!isDigit(ch)) {
if(hasInt) {
list.add("" + n);
n = 0;
hasInt = false;
}
list.add("" + ch);
}
else {
n = n * 10 + (ch - 48);
hasInt = true;
}
}

return list;
}

// Enlist the tokens in a postfix notation
static List<String> getPostFix(List<String> inFix) {
List<String> list = new ArrayList<String>();
Stack<String> oper = new Stack<String>();
int i;
char ch;
String token, peek;

for(i = 0; i < inFix.size(); i++) {
token = inFix.get(i);
ch = token.charAt(0);
if(isDigit(ch)) list.add(token);
else if(ch=='(') oper.push("" + ch);
else if(ch==')') {
while(!oper.empty()) {
peek = oper.pop();
if(peek.charAt(0)!='(') list.add(peek);
else break;
}
}
else {
while(!oper.empty()) {
peek = oper.peek();
if(peek.charAt(0)!='(' && preced(ch) <= preced(peek.charAt(0))) {
list.add(peek);
oper.pop();
}
else {
oper.push(token);
break;
}
}
}
}

return list;
}

// Evaluate the postfix notation passed as a list
static int evaluate(List<String> postFix) {
Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<Integer>();
int i, a, b;
String token;
char ch;

for(i = 0; i < postFix.size(); i++) {
token = postFix.get(i);
ch = token.charAt(0);
if(isDigit(ch)) stack.push(Integer.parseInt(token));
else {
b = stack.pop();
a = stack.pop();
switch(ch) {
case '+': a = a + b; break;
case '-': a = a - b; break;
case '*': a = a * b; break;
case '/': a = a / b; break;
case '%': a = a % b; break;
case '^': a = (int)Math.pow(a, b); break;
}
stack.push(a);
}
}

return stack.pop();
}

// Provides operator precedence
static int preced(char op) {
if(op=='^') return 3;
if(op=='*' || op=='/' || op=='%') return 2;
if(op=='+' || op=='-') return 1;
return 0;
}

// Checks if ch is a digit or not
static boolean isDigit(char ch) {
return (ch >= '0' && ch <= '9');
}
}

Sample run



(3+8-90*36)*((((89-5%6+2^3-10-10-10)))-8)+100
Postfix form: [3, 8, +, 90, 36, *, -, 89, 5, 6, %, -, 2, 3, ^, +, 10, -, 10, -, 10, -, 8, -, *, 100, +]
Result: -174266
90+0
Postfix form: [90, 0, +]
Result: 90
6+763-67*2367-(54/234)
Postfix form: [6, 763, +, 67, 2367, *, -, 54, 234, /, -]
Result: -157820

The algorithm implemented here is pretty simple, so I guess I haven't made a mistake yet, but who knows? So please check it...